I had no reason doubting Jean's 'go meet Mahama' order; she acted in bad faith – Rojo files witness statement
![](https://cdn.classfmonline.com/imagelib/thumbs/64696813.jpg)
Mr Robert Joseph Mettle-Nunoo, one of the two agents of the main opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC) who monitored the 2020 elections in the Electoral Commission’s Strong Room, has accused the Chairperson of the election management body of acting in bad faith when she announced the presidential results, after having asked him and Dr Michael Kpessa-Whyte, to go and conference with their presidential candidate, Mr John Mahama, on their qualms with the process.
In his witness statement to the Supreme Court in the ongoing election petition through which Mr Mahama is challenging the results of the polls, Mr Mettle-Nunoo corroborated Dr Kpessa-Whyte’s testimony to the court when he appeared as the former President's second witness that they felt tricked by the EC Chair.
Mr Mettle-Nunoo said: “Mrs Jean Mensa informed me that there had been a meeting held earlier in the day between the petitioner and the peace council, something I was unaware of at the time”.
“After I further drew her attention to some of the issues that were coming up in the interactions in the strong room, she said very directly that we should go and speak to the petitioner".
“Having regard to her earlier reference to the meeting between the peace council and the petitioner, which she had obviously been briefed about, I took seriously, what she said".
“I did not think that we, who were acting as agents of the petitioner, should be seen as taking positions which may be contrary to what the petitioner himself had conveyed in a meeting that I was unaware of with a body such as the peace council, which, I know has an important role in resolving disputes in connection with elections and calming tensions in the country. She indicated her own willingness to meet with the petitioner”, he wrote in the 32-point statement.
He continued: “I was also struck by the fact that she proposed that she would send a dispatch rider to help us get back to the headquarters of the EC ahead on time for her own exercise of her responsibilities. There was nothing in the discussion which could have given me any reason for doubting the word of the Chairperson of the EC. Indeed, having worked with her previously when I was a consultant to the IEA, I had no reason not to trust her. I took her at her word and I must say I was really shocked to realise how she had proceeded to make a declaration of results at a time when she knew that my colleague and I have left the premises at her instance. I can still remember her saying that she would even send a dispatch rider to hasten our return to the EC headquarters after our consultations with the petitioner”.
“Yet, my colleague and I realised with shock, when on our reaching the residence of the petitioner that the EC Chairperson was in the process of announcing the results. The petitioner naturally asked how this was possible when the same person had sent us with a message for him”.
“Attempts I made to reach the Chairperson of the EC by phone for clarification proved futile as she had turned off her phone. Clearly, the EC Chairperson had not been transparent and truthful and had taken advantage of the absence of the two representatives of the petitioner to make a premature and unconstitutional declaration. She acted with extreme bad faith, unfairly, unreasonably, and with no regard to due process”.
“I can still not believe she did what she did in the light of my experience over the years with elections in this country”.
“I have known that a declaration has to be transparent and the results must be justified by facts, figures and a transparent tally and collation of results. Clear errors, as have been admitted by the EC in this election, undermine the credibility of the whole and also casts grave doubts on the integrity of those assigned responsibilities for the free, fair and transparent conduct of elections. It is impossible to sweep these matters under the carpet”, he added.
The court will continue hearing the case tomorrow, Friday, 5 February 2021.
On Wednesday, the court unanimously declined a request by Mr Mahama to have access to all the original documents of the results for inspection.
Source: ClassFMonline.com
Trending News
Free dialysis programme: NHIA disburses ₵1 million for services, KATH receives largest share
12:59Sewa Foundation Ghana calls for basic law education in schools
17:25Women’s trade empowerment fund coming to support women-owned businesses if I become President – Bawumia
13:03COKA, Kwasi Nti join NAPO campaign in Ashanti
15:00NPP using drought crisis to deploy military and intimidate voters – Minority
13:42Doctor pharmacists threaten legal action over delays in the payment of their standard allowance
11:58Ejisu: NPP supplying marijuana to youth instead of development – Gbande
18:20Dec. polls: Feed yourself with balanced news -Peace Council to electorate
13:05NDC's Dr. Grace Ayensu Danquah offers free reconstructive surgery screening in Essikado Ketan
14:22Dec. 7 polls: We're going forward with Bawumia, reject NDC – Akufo-Addo urges Ghanaians
13:00